Railroad (Double) Crossing–a new novel

February 1st, 2010

Railroad (Double) Crossing

My second novel to be published in a year is now available. Like the first one it is set in a fictitious area of NYS and is wrapped around factual events. This time it is the toy train hobby, something I was/am involved with. There is a lot of inside information about the hobby besides the story itself about a brother and sister put in peril because of a toy train they inherited. Warning, however, there is some adult content.

As with Minimum Competency, this novel is available from iuniverse.com, Amazon.com or can be ordered by your neigherhood bookstore. I’ll have copies of the new one available, along with the other of my two books in Bartles in Oxford and First Edition in Norwich.

Catharine’s Diary Ready

October 9th, 2009

I’ve finally seen and approved the proof copy so they are ready to go. If you want information about the book see the link in the previous blog entry. The price is $12.95 plus tax and postage from Iuniverse.com or Amazon. I’ll have copies in about a week for $15 each including postage/tax. Also there will be a few copies available locally–First Edition in Norwich and Bartles in Oxford.

Catharine’s Diary

October 3rd, 2009
Front cover

Front cover

This book is at the printers and I expect to see and approve the copy next week so it should be ready in another week or so. I’ll post when this happens.

To see a bit about the book click here.

NYS Commission of Education

September 12th, 2009

This last summer the NYS Board of Regents appointed a new Commission of Education, Dr. David Milton Steiner. Below is a quote from Dr. Steiner in re to the topic of my Sept. 9 blog.

New York has consistently led the nation in raising academic standards, and it may well be time to do it again,” Steiner said.

He also targeted the state’s 92% average passing rate on a teacher certification test, which state schools chancellor Merryl Tisch highlighted in a recent Daily News op/ed. “Now, we have extraordinary teachers in New York, don’t misunderstand me,” he said. “Nevertheless, it seems to me that a gateway certification test that has that high a pass rate should give us pause, and we need to take a look at that.”

Sounds like more of “same old, same old”.

Of course Dr. Steiner comes with impeccable credentials.

First he was, primarily, raised in Great Britain where he went to private school excepting for one year when he attended PS41 in NYC. Therefore he never had to put up with bullies trying to steal his lunch money or unruly classmates that required his teachers’ attention thus taking away from classroom instruction time. (Unless, of course it was Hogworth’s in which case he will need all the magic he can muster.) He then graduated with his BA and MA in philosophy, politics and economics from Balliol College at Oxford University and finished up by getting his PHD in political science from Harvard University. All of which certainly qualified him for absolutely nothing but further work in academia and allowed him the credentials to apply for grants. Additionally, like all academics, he published a few books to survive in the hallowed halls.

Then from 1999 to 2004 Dr. Steiner was a professor at Boston University’s School of Education where he taught in the Department of Administration, Training and Policy Studies and the Department of Curriculum and Teaching. I wonder how many of his students were forced to take his courses in order to graduate, how closely he had to hew to curriculum set forth by an outside agency, how long he spent creating lesson plans, writing and correcting tests, and explaining his grading to parents? He then moved to Hunter College where his main concern seems to have been in teaching prospective teachers to teach. I assume these were not any of the 8% that failed the teacher certification test.

(This latter position seems to have been one of the strong points in gaining him the Commissioner’s job since Steiner developed a curriculum at Hunter from 2005 to 2008 that supposedly improved teacher training. Inasmuch as it takes at least 5 years for a new teacher to “prove out” I would be interested to see if this methodology actually holds up and how many of those trained by it are, in fact, good teachers. Since education innovation takes time to work or not, only time will tell whether this experiment is a real breakthrough or just another of those failed novelties dreamed up in the Ivory Tower of academia. Likewise, this “experiment” was, like most of done in the field of education, hardly scientific in that there were no control groups or blind testing.)

My main point is this: Steiner is just one of a long line of educational administrators who are in charge of NYS education and have never spent an iota of time in the classroom. Or, if they have, have been either unhappy in their role of teacher or dismissed from their position. As such they and their ilk have absolutely no idea what is it like to teach. Nor do they realize the problems that teachers have to overcome; from poor parental support, apathy on the part of students, and asinine administrative directives just to being to impart knowledge to their students. Until those in charge of education realize that they need input from teachers in the field, the system will flounder and only succeed in spite of the people at the top, not because of them.

Education and Testing

September 9th, 2009

Ok, school’s started so enough with golf and lawn mowing, time for more important stuff like rounding up all the urchins and getting them wedged back into school soon enough so they can be taught for the Regents’ test. For those of you that need information on NYS Regents exams, see my latest book Minimum Competency where I give an extensive history of these exams. (If you don’t have the book, buy one at IUniverse.com, Amazon.com, BarnesandNobel.com, eBay or have your friendly local bookstore order one for you.) At any rate, I was one of those teachers that happened to have liked the idea of these state-wide exams, depending on how they were used.

First they keep teachers and schools on task and up to minimum levels. A teacher has to teach the curriculum not concentrate on one area where he or she feels most comfortable with. An English teach can’t teach just Shakespeare, for example, ignoring literature. Or a history teacher just concentrate on wars because they kept their students interested but has to create interest in the causes and effects. A math teacher can’t emphasize algebra and leave out trigonometry because they feel out of depth with it. A teacher has to be able to get across every aspect of their level or go back to school to become competent in it. Likewise, testing results are a good indication as to where a particular student falls in relation to others in the state. This allows schools of higher learning as well as employees to know what level of knowledge these students have achieved no matter where they learned it. At the same time it allows teachers at the next level to know that the students coming to them have reached a certain plateau in their knowledge—although, admittedly they forgot most of it over the intervening summer—so they have a starting point for the next level. Finally, it gives the students a feeling of confidence just knowing they not only have reached a certain level but are on a par with their peers at that level.

There is a bad side as well. Primarily this comes from reading into the test results things that are not there. For one thing, poor scores are not necessarily indicative of poor teaching or poor learning. Not all students learn at the same rate any more than all of them grow and mature alike. To say that once a student completed a single year in, say algebra at age 14, doesn’t mean they learned everything in that course. Maybe the child needed more time, a different teaching method or outside incentive. A failure in one or the other of these exams may simply mean there needed to be more and/or alternative teaching. Noneducators (by these I mean anyone outside the classroom either administrators, state ed department functionaries, or parents) tend to jump to the wrong conclusion when looking at test scores and blame them on either teachers or students when there can be outside influences to poor scores. These influences include, but are not limited to: a bad test, the testing of material outside the acceptable content of the curricula, the wrong students (or teacher) being expect to learn (or teach) that subject at that point in time.

Even more of a problem is the thinking by those in the Ivory Tower of the Educational Department that not everyone should be able to pass a particular test. But if these tests are designed correctly then all of the students should be able to achieve whatever is considered the minimum score. In other words, if a test is fair then all the students should pass it. While, granted, all don’t, if they or at least a substantial number of them do, then so be it. The problem is that this isn’t the case. Some in the upper echelons of education has recently decided that because the state’s schools are showing marked improvement on the elementary Language Arts, Math and Science exams that these exams are becoming too easy. Maybe it’s time they decide what it is they want; educated students or lower marks. Obviously if, in the beginning, a standard was set then it should remain. Unfortunately too, many people in Albany have too much time to sit around and think of ways to make themselves important at the expense of those in the trenches.

Regents’ Exams or standardized tests are great if they are used correctly. Unfortunately, what is failed to be recognized is that these tests are being taken by many square pegged children who cannot and should not, be fitted into a nice round hole. While it is fairly easy to test to see if every Buick rolling off the assembly line will start, there is not sure way to be sure that every algebra student can graph a straight line. Also, while starting a Buick may be important to its function, graphing a straight line may not be to that child. What should be done are for someone—preferably teachers with classroom experience in the field working with those outside the educational system—to decide what is needed and what the minimum standards should be. Then design a curriculum around these standards and work up testing that, while checking for perfection in the topic, will allow all those who meet these standards to “pass”. Once this test is tweaked so these standards are met, leave it alone and allow children and teachers to move passed them at the student’s rate, even if it means taking more (or less) time than noneducators think it should. That will make testing meaningful.

NY Senate Coup and A Modest Proposal For State Government

June 9th, 2009

One thing about the legislation in Albany always has been that it could be safely ignored. For the most part our distinguished representatives appear twice a year: in the fall when they run for reelection and in the spring when they’re taking turns arguring with the governor as to who is causing the budget to be late. Between these two seasons, excepting for an occasional pop-up in the local news when they are pushing some sort of pet project in an attempt to get reelected, they tend to disappear.

Not this year.

Seems the Republicans were unable to come to terms with the fact that, after thirty some years, they had lost their majority in the State Senate. (That it happened last fall and took them nearly seven months to realize this before trying to do something to regain control, comes as no surprise.) At any rate the Republicans came up with a plan whereby they could regain control by bringing a couple of dissatisfied Democrats into their fold (given this is NYS, finding dissatisfied Democrats is just a matter of throwing a rock in any direction. Plus they picked a couple of good ones; one is being investigated for misappropation of funds and the other is under indictment for slashing his girl friend. Do we elect solid citizens or not?). The carrot for this seems to have been promising one of the Democrats, Pedro Estrada, that he would be tempory president of the Senate under this new coalition. (Hey, Pedro, the word is “tempory” how long to do think you’ll hold this position once a couple more Republicans are elected?) Rather than do this last fall when there wasn’t a helova lot of legislation to do, they picked the end of the session to create this brouhaha, effectively ceasing any kind of legislative progress that might have been done before they take their extended summer vacation (and gear up for the fall elections). I especially like the reasoning: The Republicans needed to get control because the current, Democratic-led Senate was not getting anything done. Yeah, right, like they aren’t going to be embroiled in a “He said/ He said” legal fight from now until the end of the session. Plus, of course, the previous 30+ Republican-led Senates weren’t exactly task oriented.

For a long time I’ve felt that there needs to be something done to reduce the number of idiots in the legslative branch of the govenment. To my way of thinking, the best way to do this as well as cut the cost of government was very simple; just double the number of people each State Representative and Senator needed to represent. This would simply slash the number of people in both bodies in half. Not only would the cost drop by at least a third(yeah, a third because those left would need more money) but, hopefully, with twice the number running maybe we’d get a real choice. At least it would retire half of the incumbents that have held the same office for years. When you stop to think about it, the district sizes are formed using arbitrary numbers arrived at back in a time when travel and communication were a problem. In this day of airplanes, helicopters, Interstate highways, television, computers, Twitter, Facebook and whatever, anyone that is interested can be instantly in contact with anyone, anywhere. Any legislator could just as effectively represent 2 people as 1 and their job could easily be down-sized. Of course this would require a change in the state constitution but it would be doable. It could also work for the US House of Representatives as well. All that is needed is someone to get the ball rolling.

OK, We’ll Try Again

June 3rd, 2009

sku-000124263_m1

I’ve seen the revised copy and it is corrected so feel free to purchase one at your friendly local book store (they may have to order it unless you can get them to stock it), any on-line book outlet including Barnes and Nobel and Amazon, or from IUnivers.com. Enjoy.

Now on to the next one.

How’s Them Onions???

May 30th, 2009

I guess everyone reaches the point in their life when they begin suffer fools less. I know I got there a while ago but, lately, I have found myself putting up with less and less of the bs that gets tossed around. What especially ticks me off are those that feel it is ok to insult my intelligence. This last month or so I had a case that proves the point.

For a number of years I have been ordering sweet onion plants from the Park Seed Co. of Greenwood, SC. These plants are started someplace in Texas and mailed so I get them in midApril. This year, however, I had not received them by the first week in May so I contacted the company. I received a return email informing me that my order would be sent when it was the proper planting time for my area which would be late May or early June. I replied to this email by informing the writer that previously the plants had come in April, been planted as soon as I could get them in the ground—usually after a week or so in the refrigerator because the ground was too wet to work—and we began harvesting them in mid to late June. This email was answer to the effect that the writer was in error but there had been a problem with production and the plants would be sent as soon as possible. Ok, I wasn’t happy about that but, as a gardener, I understand how those things can happen.

On May 20, I get an email that the onions are being sent via USPS. Since this is also the week that the PO is closed for Memorial Day, I hope the package will arrive by Saturday so it doesn’t sit around until Tuesday. They aren’t there on Saturday nor are they there when the PO reopens on Tuesday. So I email the company again. I am told that it will take a week meaning they should be there the 27th which is Wednesday. They aren’t there on the 27, this generates another email. They aren’t there on the 28th either. Now I’m pissed.

So I send an email informing them that do to the fact these onions are so late, I should be given a refund. The return email informs me that according to the USDA zone chart the planting time for my onions is the end of May and that if I want a refund I must return the onions. (This email is signed by the fourth person to respond—I have an idea that there is only one person in customer service, they just sign an arbitrary name to the computer generated response.) Now my intelligence is being insulted since I know the correct time for planting onions in this area is April. In addition, since these plants will now be going in so late that they may be up against warm, dry weather which may impede their development, I am concerned that they will not mature correctly. This certainly qualifies me for some monetary compensation. Also, since planting time for onions in this area is now a month late, it is impossible to find plants locally to replace them should I return them. Park Seed knows they have me over a barrel and have no intention of admitting the problem is theirs.

I write a return email to this effect and inform whoever is reading it that I am not some Gen-Xer that is making his first garden because the President’s wife is planting one on the White House lawn. I also inform them that, in spite of having purchased seeds from Park for over 40 years—I have kept a garden log that goes back to 1965 and I was using their seeds then—I would no longer buy from them. In addition, I thought that it would have been a case of common courtesy for them to have told me the onions would be late arriving and have given me the opportunity to cancel the order and buy locally. After a month, that train had long left the station and they not only owed me an apology but a refund plus the onions. As of this morning, I have not received a response to that email but suspect that when I do it will be a generic one signed by another person. I do know that the next Park catalog that arrives here—something that occurs with a fair degree of regularly—that I will return it.

BTW, if you’re reading this and wish to know the names and addresses of other seed companies email me, I have a number that are reliable and which I will be using from this point forward.

Addendum: Back in the last week of April I was in the local Lowe’s and noticed they had flats of a dozen Walla Walla sweet onion plants. Since my garden was ready and I hadn’t received my Park order I picked up one and put them in the ground that day. Now, after two frosts and one hard freeze, these onions are golf ball sized and should be usable in a couple of weeks. Just to prove that I, rather than some employee in customer service, knows what he’s doing.

PS: I had some problems getting this blog posted two days ago. As of today, the onion plants are still between here and TX. Also, I after I email Park again today I receive another computer generated email which was signed by a fifth person.

Stop the Presses

May 6th, 2009

Don’t order my book just yet!!! Apparently the file for my book got corrupted somehow and the publisher, IUniverse, printed an error filled book. I’ll let you know when the corrected version will be out–once we work out whose fault it is and whose going to pay for the revisions.

In case you’ve ordered on, either see if they will let you return it or contact me and I’ll give you the corrections.

My Novel

April 27th, 2009

Ok, folks, it is finally done and published–second week of May. Below is the opening of chapter 1. If you want more you have to buy it, just follow the link or contact me at my email address.

It was not a good Monday morning for Moses Barkman. Sunday night’s rain had screwed up the reception on his satellite dish and, when that finally cleared, the pay-per-view, no holds barred, smack down, WWE wrestling match he had ordered was partly over. By the time the rerun started, he was almost through the first six-pack of Premium Genesee Beer and, since he could not remember who won or lost the bout, he had to stay up and watch the whole damn thing again on the rerun. This meant consuming a second, and his final, six-pack. Now, the combination of the late night and cheap beer was not making for an especially pleasant morning. To make matters worse, his welfare check had arrived in last Friday’s mail and, since it was Monday, it meant it was about time he got to town to cash it. While he could have had the check directly deposited, he was not one to trust any damn bank to handle his money; he wanted the cash in his hands. Besides, a trip to town and the cash would at least give him a chance to restock his supply of Camels, Genny and Slim Jims at the Stop ‘N Go.

Moses lived about three miles from the center of Snyder’s Corners at the end of a single-lane, dirt road. The area around him was mostly second growth timber that, after having been logged a number of times, had now reached the point where anything that was worth cutting was long gone. Maybe in another hundred years, if there were no major infestations of gypsy moth larvae or other exotic insects, it might merit harvesting again. Not that Moses minded. Since the land had been logged over and was not near any kind of fishable stream or lake, the land was worthless to outsiders that might buy it up for delinquent back real estate taxes. Moses was a prime candidate for this, since he had not paid his real estate taxes–school or county–for five years.

As long as his rural road was not snow-covered–a common factor in the winter months–it normally took five minutes for Moses to drive his Ford pickup to town, including a stop at the mailbox located where this dirt road met New York State Route 618. Today, however, it was going to take a bit longer since deer season was only a couple of weeks away and Moses wanted to check a piece of cover for deer-sign on the way. This one area in particular had a small run-down apple orchard next to a shallow pond that made it ideal deer habitat. Moses had considered putting up a tree stand in one of the apple trees assuming there was enough encouraging deer-sign around to make it worthwhile–of course, too, that would have meant that he have to find wood, nails and the ambition to build the stand. Of the three, the latter was decidedly lacking.

So he decided he would just check the cover and, if he found anything, file it away for later use. This examination did create one more problem for him, however, because in order to check the cover thoroughly he would have to park his truck on the shoulder of Route 618 and walk down a deer path for about a hundred yards through overgrown brush and blackberry brambles. This was nothing Moses was especially fond of doing on even a good day much less one when he was still feeling the effects of the previous evening. Given his hangover, he was in no condition for bushwhacking and would have been content to stay in the truck and do a visual check from there.

He was considering his options when he arrived at the pull off spot and was leaning toward ignoring it when he noticed that the path leading to the clearing showed signs of recent use. Brush, primarily the golden rod and sumac on either side of the path, was mashed down, a clear indication that something big had used the path sometime over the weekend. Getting out of the truck, Moses closely inspected the ground for deer tracks but could not see any. This was not surprising since, while as Moses, with his scraggy beard, oily baseball cap, flannel shirt and bib overalls looked like a central casting type of mountain man, he was anything but an expert outdoorsman. His appearance had more to do with lack of hygiene and apathy about wardrobe than any attempt to fill any role. Not that his tracking ability or lack thereof would have made any difference since, had there been tracks, they would not have survived the previous night’s rain. However, he did know that if deer had used the path and if one had been a buck, there was a good chance of spotting antler rubs on some of the scrub brush along the way. Therefore, hangover or no, a hike to the pond was unavoidable.

As he went further down the path, checking both sides for rubs, he could not help but notice there was an increasingly larger amount of disturbed brush as he went further from the road. Even with his nominal amount of experience, he could see that something big had taken place within the last day or two. Excited, he figured he had better check closer to the little pond, in case a couple of bucks had fought in the clearing. Someplace in his distant past, Moses had read in an outdoor magazine about these duels and how often the bucks could get their antlers locked together.

Now wouldn’t that be somethin’? Moses thought, ignoring his pounding head and increasing his pace in anticipation.

As he neared the clearing beside the pond, Moses found the shortest route blocked by a mass of brambles. In a hurry and rather than go around he decided to push his way straight through, which is how he put is foot right in the middle of the dead man’s chest.

Minimum Competency is the title and available through the link or from Amazon, Barnes and Nobel or me–unless you can talk your local bookseller into stocking it. :-)