Archive for the ‘sports’ Category

A Great Event

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Hundreds of thousands of people packed together in a mass of humanity, all with hope for a better day which may not be realized. Experts making wild predictions, both pro and con, as to what will transpire based on the experience gain while being part of events leading up to this day. A huge uptick in commericalism that may lead to increased revenue and economic growth; pumping thousands if not millions into the economy of a single city. A media frenzy fueling all of this with 24/7 coverage and bulletins inside of bulletins and indepth interviews with those involved as well as spectators.

Obama’s inaugural? Nope, Super Bowl LXII. We Americas know what’s important.

Goodbye to the “Kicker”

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

When you get to my age one of the first things you read in the morning paper—usually between the crossword puzzle and the sport’s page—are the obits. It is one of those habits that has gradually taken on a life of its own, done without thought on my part, a habitual search for something. Sort of like standing in front of the refrigerator door and not really knowing why you’re there. It does, however, have some merit. I do gain some information, usually about the life of a former acquaintance, colleague or maybe the wife of some guy I bowled against. Most are lives well lived and deaths that aren’t unexpected. Most, that is, except when I come across an obit of one of my former students. While accidents can happen to people at any age, when they die of one or the other of those maladies of “old age” it comes as a shock to me. How could it be that kids I knew when they were in their late teens be old enough to have become victims of one or the other of those things that should be taking out my generation?

That happened last week: A former student, age 61, died of a heart attack. It doesn’t seem possible.

Now this isn’t the first time this has happened, not even the first time in the last month. It is not that he was a special student, so gifted in some learned way that he was bound for greatness. In fact, if truth be told, he was an indifferent student in my math class. Nor was he an especially old and dear friend that I‘d had a close post-high school relationship with. (Although, this being a small place, in later years we both sold items in a local craft cooperative.) No, the thing that made him special was the memories that, seeing his obit, came back to me. You see, he was the first “kicker”.

(Disclaimer: I’m going by memory and not going back to look up dates but, given his age at death and the fact that he would have been 17 or 18 as a high school senior, I’m guessing he played football in the early to mid1960’s.)

In the 1960’s high school football in this area was entirely different than it is now. For one thing teams played in leagues that were geographically set up for all sports (male only, by the way) and not football specific divisions arranged according to the size of the schools to allow for a maximum of divisional “champions” (routinely with 2 -1 but overall losing records). In addition there were no sectional or state playoffs. A school played six or seven league games plus one or two nonleague ones for practice. In our case, we were in a seven-team league and played 8 games: six in the league and two nonleague, the second of which was traditionally played as the last game of the season against Greene. (This made no sense inasmuch as Greene had then, as it does now, about half again as many students as we did. This game was a traditional David vs. Goliath match in which Goliath not only won but inflicted a great deal of damage to David’s players.) In short, our high school team had three goals at the beginning of each season: win the league, go undefeated and beat Greene. Success at any one would be considered a good season. All three would make the team immortal. In the 60’s it was rare for any one of the three to happen. (Another might have been, given the limited number of male athletes, to come out of the Greene game with enough healthy players to field a basketball team.) One final difference: with school traditionally starting on the Wednesday after Labor Day, this was also the first day of football practice—July and August were for other things.

Aside from the above, things were pretty much the same then as now. Boys followed their fathers on to the gridiron. Families and friends gathered on Saturday to watch games—only one team in the league had lights and played on Fridays. It was a small town team from a small town school where games were played on real grass fields which; given multiuse, turned into quagmires in the rain and, at least once per season, snow. It was a game where boys became men and the men who fathered them didn’t think they knew more than the coach because they watched three or more pro games per week. And, oh yeah, there wasn’t much foot in football.

There were a couple of rules that prevented this. First, the point-after touchdown (PAT) could be scored by either kicking through the uprights, or moving the ball over the goal line with a run or successful pass. Either way, it was worth only a single point. Second, if a team gave up the ball by either punt or field goal try, the ball went to the defensive team either where they recovered it or, if it crossed the goal line and stayed there, at the 20-yard line. This latter rule meant that, as long as you had a kicker that could get it high enough early enough and kick it far enough, a field goal try was as good as a punt. That it was worth 3 points wasn’t a consideration since no one was that accurate anyway and failure to score was not consider a bad thing. With these two options for the kicking game, there wasn’t much call for a player that specialized in place kicking. If one came along and the coach recognized him, fine, otherwise kicking was an afterthought at best. That is until the first real kicker came along.

The story at the time was that it was his father’s idea and, given his closeness to his Dad, the father probably was responsible, maybe even pushed him into it. Nonetheless, the son practiced in the backyard kicking over telephone lines; against the neighbor’s house, whenever he could. He might not have been diligent about his school work, but he was about his kicking and, by the time he reached high school, he was good at it. Now this wasn’t some foreign, soccer style, sidewinder kind of kicking. It was straight ahead, Lou Groza style kicking: get behind the ball, line it up and boot it straight through. He was, for a high school player, able to hit them accurately from the 30-yard line in and rarely missed a PAT. In short, for that time and place he was a pioneering wonder, a specialist, and, because the coach wasn’t afraid to use him, a winner of football games. Touchdowns became a sure 7 points and fourth downs inside the 20 turned into 3. The team won games by slim margins, even beat Greene. Strangers showed up to watch and local sport’s writers took notice, sport’s page stories were written. Sure, he would have been more than an adequate football player as a back and defensive player but as a kicker, he was special. He also begat a culture whereby in the ensuing years the team had a series of kickers the like of which no local team has produced. Coaches changed and the kicking style changed but the kickers kept turning up, some good enough to continue on to the next level. So long is the list that, when the latest kicker was written up by a local paper, the writer failed to know the history and succession of kickers so the original wasn’t even acknowledged.

Maybe that’s why I’m writing this. Maybe it is because I remember standing behind an end zone on a crisp fall day and watching a 30-yarder off his toe, arcing high, tumbling end-over-end and splitting the uprights. Maybe it is because I remember this and think others should as well. Remembering that there was a time when things began and, when all is said and done, those who were there first should be remembered. RIP George Genung, you were the “kicker”.

Well, the Super (Boring) Bowl is over for another year—Whoopee!!

Monday, February 4th, 2008

For those that looked at my blog last February 2nd (under sports), you’ll know I’m not a big fan of the Super Bowl. However, the one yesterday was interesting as a football game as it had everything: underdog vs. perfect season and a truly exciting last 10 minutes. The only drawbacks were having to have to listen to Troy Aikman for a couple of hours and the fact the NY Giants won.

First, Aikman. If I were a UCLA grad I’d be embarrassed that one of my fellow alums—assuming Troy actually graduated from college—had such a poor mastery of the English language. I’ve yet to listen to a Fox broadcast where he was doing the color where he didn’t butcher the native tongue to some extent—i.e. “we was”, “they is”, etc. I swear the man treats the “g” in any word ending with “ing” as silent. There has to be someone out there that is better. (If I hear “I’m gonna tell ya.” one more time, I’m going to throw a shoe through the TV screen.) To think they used to make fun of poor Dizzy Dean for using “slud”.

As far as the Giants were concerned, I must confess to not being a fan—never was, won’t be now. As far as my rooting for a professional football team is concern, I tend to move around depending on players—primarily the QB—and coaches rather than follow a team based on geography. Over the years I’ve rooted for Graham and Brown, Namath and Ewbanks, Bradshaw and Noll, Merrideth and Landry, and, currently P Manning and Dungey. (Note: Brady and Belichick aren’t included, primarily because I’m not a Belichick fan.) Otherwise I go with a team trying to prove something. Yesterday I was hoping the Patriots would win just so they’d have the perfect season and shut up those petty ’72 Dolphins.

Seems to me that if anyone should appreciate perfection it would be that team and they should welcome any team that could duplicate their feat. Instead they gleefully break out the champagne every time a team that is approaching an undefeated season loses. It’s kind of like dancing on someone’s grave for spite. I was hoping the Pats were going to end this.

So, at any rate, the Giant fans have their win and they can now go back to where ever it is they go those years when their team finishes out of the play-offs. Also they can practice their boos for Eli and “Tom must go!!” chant for next year, because you can expect to hear both come next November.

Syracuse and the NCAA’s

Wednesday, March 14th, 2007

Like a lot of people in Central NY, I’m disappointed as well as mystified that SU wasn’t included in the NCAA tournament. While I understand that the selection committee had only 64 positions to fill and had to draw the line someplace, I just question their inclusion of Texas Tech, Stanford, Illinois and Arkansas ahead of SU—both in terms of quantity and quality of wins. (I’m of a mind that the Pac-10 is a weak conference which only gets high rankings because the West Coast sportswriters push it. Likewise the Big-12, Big-10 and the SEC, once one gets to the middle-of-the-pack teams, are not as tough as the middle Big East.)

Of course too, each year there are questions in re to at-large teams selected and teams left off; this year is just a continuation of these arguments. As long as the final selection is going to be done by men there are bound to be discrepancies. Maybe they should go back to having each Division I conference hold a final league tournament with the winner of that tournament going to the NCAA’s, the rest stay home. There are enough conferences now that this would give the tournament a full field. If not, make provisions for filling out the remaining spots with those teams who won their regular season conference title but did not win the league’s tournament.

At any rate, March Madness is upon us and time to fill out the brackets—bet your money and take your choice. BTW, if you want a good technique, if you aren’t sure of who will win any game, pick the team whose campus or league is further east. Check it our, it works about 75% of the time.

One other note: Mike Lopresti makes a great observation in final two paragraphs of this morning’s column to the effect that if you think picking 65 teams for the basketball tournament is tough, imagine what it would be like to select 8 for a college football playoff.

Observations in re to College Basketball

Sunday, March 11th, 2007

This last week was one of the better ones for college basketball in that many teams were attempting to play into the NCAA’s. If anything, I enjoy it more than the actual March Madness because there are more winners–only problem is I have to endure Billy Packer and Dick Vital.

Some observations:

When will some Muslim group protest the Holy Cross mascot? Since the Native Americans have successfully gotten rid of all the college references to them, I expect the next thing will be to get rid of the Crusader and Knight images. (I’m mad about the use of the Vikings to represent the Minnesota football team since the way they have been playing and as well as acting off the field reflects badly on my ancestry.)

Don’t basketball coaches know how to do math? I’d say that if a team scores less than 234 points during the first 39 minutes of play they aren’t going to make up 6 or more points in the last minute. Yet coaches insist in calling for fouling and time outs in an attempt to make up these kinds of deficits. It didn’t work in all the games I watched.

Speaking of fouling, when are the refs gonna call deliberate fouls in the last minute? It seems everyone but the guys with the whistles know these fouls are on purpose. Give the player two shots and his/her team the ball and the games will be over faster.

As far as the refs are concerned, I’ve seen a lot of blown calls, usually because the ref was out of position and anticipated what was going to happen rather that actually see it. I just wonder if the officials are so overworked at this time of year that they are tired–I noted one who did a game in MSG one night and in Indy the next, this may be just too much. The refs are trying to keep up with kids half their age and it is wearing them down.

Speaking of wearing down, it would seem that, with games on 3 and 4 consecutive nights, some of the players are tiring. Interesting that some of the first year players who are considering turning pro are having this kind of problem. What are they going to do when they have to play every night in the pros where the games are half again longer and played back to back to back? Maybe they should consider stay in college for a few more years to build up their stamina.

As far as the NCAA’s are concerned, again it is going to be a crap shoot primarily because most of the better teams are so young. Unless a team has veterans to bolster their lineup, these freshmen can disappear in big games. It is going to be an interesting tournament but I wouldn’t be the farm on any team.

Stupor Bowl–Reprised

Friday, February 2nd, 2007

Once again we await, with baited breath, for the Super Bowl. That is everyone but me. Oh, I’ll watch and will be rooting for the Colts, mainly because I like the way Dungy coaches and Manning controls the game. Also they have a couple of Syracuse University grads that I enjoy watching, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to treat the game like it is the most important thing in my life. It is, afterall, just a bunch of overweight, overpaid, guys pushing each other around for an hour–with an over long break between the first and second thirty minutes to sell beer and cars. Beside, generally, these games are boring as both teams try not to lose which turns the game into something played between the twenty-yard lines.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m a big sports fan but pro football isn’t the highest thing on my list. Given my druthers, I’d rather watch a college basketball men’s game, college women’s game, college football or MLB game–in that order–before I’d watch a NFL game. Judging from the demographics, I would guess this puts me in a minority–especially in re to women’s basketball and baseball–but I don’t really care. A well played college basketball game (men or women) or a MLB game is more enjoyable for me to watch both athletically and aesthetically than either NFL or NBA games. Whereas a college football game is usually turned on exciting plays and/or one team’s ability to overcome the weather elements. (Who could not have become a lifelong college fan after watching the final quarter of the Boise State/Oklahoma bowl game?)

As far as the NBA is concerned, I stick their games down there below volleyball and soccer as a sport I bother to watch. I’ve been so turned off by the “Me, Me, Me!!” stuff and the physical play of the NBA, that I haven’t watched more than a couple minutes of any game in the last dozen or so years.

So, at any rate, come Sunday evening, my TV will be turned into the Super Bowl game, although it probably won’t be tuned to CBS before 6:30 to avoid all the pregame hype. Hopefully the ads will prove to be enjoyable.

A Season in Dornoch

Wednesday, January 10th, 2007

A Season in Dornoch, Golf and Life in the Scottish Highlands, by Lorne Rubenstein. This book was a birthday gift from my oldest who thinks I should be reading more about golf. However, like it’s subtitle says, it is not strictly a golf book and whether you’re a golfer or not, you will find something to enjoy in it. In fact, if you were to read it just for the golfing information, you might be sorely disappointed. Rubenstein writes about three months in the summer of 2000 that he spent in the Scottish Highlands at Dornoch, ostensibly to play the local golf course, Royal Dornoch Golf Club—a links course on the edge of the North Sea. There is enough golf information to make this a good read for a golfer but there is more to the book than that—it includes a history of the area of Scotland as well as a look at the people who live there now. Rubenstein and his wife, Nell (a nongolfer btw) explore the area and Lorne writes fairly extensively about the “Highland Clearances”—the removal of the local farmers(crofters) by the Duke of Sutherland to make room for sheep in the early 1800’s. To someone unfamiliar with Scotland, this is an intriguing and sad piece of its history.

Rubenstein is a good writer whether about golf—he is, after all, a golf writer having written books with many of the top teachers/ players of the game as well as coauthored A Disorderly Compendium of Golf (see “what I’m reading”) and plays to a three handicap—or describing the scene from the top of Ben Bhraggie. In between, you will get into the mind of a golfer as well as meet some of the people that make Scotland an interesting place to visit. I highly recommend this book to anyone whether a golfer or no, it is a good read. I guarantee you’ll find something to make you keep turning pages.

A Disorderly Compendium of Golf

Thursday, December 14th, 2006

Wisdom, Folly, Rules, Truths, Trivia, and More

Do you know how to figure a golf handicap? (Turns out it requires a degree in advanced mathematics or good computer program but anyway…) How about how to get on the St. Andrews golf course? These, plus several hundred other bits and pieces of information are found in this book by Lorne Rubenstein and Jeff Neuman. Filled with, mostly, one and two page bits of minutiae, this book will let you in on 378 pages of things about the game and those who played it that you never thought you would want to know. (Ingredients in the famous Pimento sandwiches sold at the Masters?) If you into golf or are into the trivial or into trivia about golf, this is a great book to have handy. (Want to know the correct way to play the various gambling games of golf?) It is available in paperback from Workman Publishing—I found my copy in the books section of Wegman’s.

Golf Season is Still Here

Monday, November 13th, 2006

My daughter took the photo of Karen and me on the 8th green of the Canasawacta Country Club Saturday afternoon.

ccc

For those in the south who think we’re covered with ice and snow now, my wife, daughter, grand daughter and I went golfing on Veterans Day. Kirsten bloged about it. The weather was great for 17 holes–temperatures set a record of 67–but the rain hit while we were on the 18th tee and we were a bit soaked when we finished. All but my grand daugher, whose mother wisely packed along her raincoat.

The Echoing Green

Thursday, October 26th, 2006

The Untold Story of Bobby Thomson, Ralph Branca and the Shot Heard Round the World, by Joshua Prager. My youngest daughter gave this book to me for my last birthday since she thought, correctly, that I must have been around for this game on October 3, 1951. Not only was I around for it, I remember watching it in black and white on a TV set in Bobby Lawler’s living room with a collection of other guys my age. I also remember praying that the Giants would come back against the hated Dodgers to win this last game of the National League playoff.

While I was then and am to this day, a Braves fan—they being in Boston at the time—growing up only 90 miles from NYC, I had to adopt one of the clubs there when my Braves weren’t doing well—a common occurrence in the late ‘40’s and early 50’s. Since I was also an ABY fan (Anybody But the Yankees) this meant opting for one of the metropolitan National League team. That team was the Giants. And, as any Giant fan worth his salt knows, if you rooted for the Giants, you hated the Dodgers—unless, of course, they played the Yankees in the World Series, in which case you had to root for a NL team. So, it was that I found myself asking God to allow the Giants to, somehow, come back against those Dodgers. It is one of the few times that my faith has been immediately rewarded.

Therefore, I was excited to get a book that looks, in depth, at one of the events I remember so well from my past—right up there with my marriage, the birth of my kids, the death of my father, and JFK’s assassination. While I am enjoying the story—at this point I’m about half way through it—I am finding the author’s writing a bit hard to follow.

When one is reading for pleasure, it is nice to be ably to read along without having to stop and ponder what in hell that last sentence means. Try this one: “The gods of baseball had what to work with.” I’m still trying to figure out that sentence, which appeared on p15—is there a question mark and/or a “that” missing? Mostly, however, Prager often writes as if he’s doing dialogue for Yoda. Take this sentence: “”It was the maligned Thomson who won for Durocher his debut, a pinch-single with two out in the eight giving New York a 6- 5 win.” Then there is this: “Ott was out, thrown a sinecure beside farm director Carl Hubbell in the front office.” Now I’ve a pretty good vocabulary but I had to look up the meaning of “sinecure” and, when I did, still am not sure how it was “thrown” at Mel Ott.

These are only a couple of examples, there are many others. My overall impression is that either English is a second language for Prager (actually not the case as his parents were from NYC, but then again…) or he needed, and didn’t get, a good editor. At any rate, this writing is a good example of what can be done when one has a word processing computer and, I guess, we’re going to have to get used to it.

Which is too bad, because the story is a good one and Prager has done a lot of research on not only the game itself but the principals and the times surrounding them. Take the information that the Giants had a coach in the clubhouse with a spyglass stealing the catcher’s signs and relaying them to the batter—Thomson may well have known what pitch Branca was sending his way. Not only is this written up, but Prager gives personal background information about those who proposed the spying, supplied the glass, and wired the bell. It is all good stuff and interesting, too bad it isn’t easier to read.

From an historical point, the book is interesting. Just don’t expect to sit down a breeze through it. Frankly, I’ve found mathematics texts that were easier reading.